44.8

Reading dated 2026-08-12

Stupidity, here, is worse than malice. Malice requires intent. Stupidity requires none. That is why it spreads faster than malice, and answers to no one.

Much of it is not a flaw in any individual mind. It is a failure of coordination: a species that understands a risk clearly enough to name it, and still cannot act on that knowledge together.

This index measures that failure. Not intelligence. Not virtue. It makes no moral claim about any person. What it tracks is simpler, and harder to look away from: how much agency our species still holds over the risks it has created for itself, and whether that agency is growing or running out.

The index over time

1000

1789–2026 · line opacity marks how many of the 7 pillars have real data that year

7 pillars

Existential risk

How close humanity has pushed itself toward irreversible catastrophe, nuclear war above all.

w 0.2044.5
Armed conflict

How much organised violence is happening right now, and how many people it has driven from their homes.

w 0.1550.8
Interpersonal harm

How much people harm each other directly, outside of war: exploitation, homicide, and violence within homes and communities.

w 0.1527.6
Climate and biosphere

How much we have altered the atmosphere, and how much wildlife has vanished as a result.

w 0.2053.9
Resource misallocation

How much the world spends preparing for war compared with what it spends helping people survive, and how concentrated its wealth has become.

w 0.1058.9
Epistemic condition

How free people are to know the truth and to have a say in how they are governed.

w 0.1059.4
Cooperation

How well governments, institutions, and communities cooperate on the existential risks no single nation can solve alone.

w 0.1015.0

Explore the weights

The weights above are a judgement, not a derivation, stated plainly in the methodology. Move them and see what the index would read under a different judgement. This is not the published reading; hover a pillar to see which cells are its.

44.8

Published weights

w 0.20 · score 44.5

How close humanity has pushed itself toward irreversible catastrophe, nuclear war above all.

w 0.15 · score 50.8

How much organised violence is happening right now, and how many people it has driven from their homes.

w 0.15 · score 27.6

How much people harm each other directly, outside of war: exploitation, homicide, and violence within homes and communities.

w 0.20 · score 53.9

How much we have altered the atmosphere, and how much wildlife has vanished as a result.

w 0.10 · score 58.9

How much the world spends preparing for war compared with what it spends helping people survive, and how concentrated its wealth has become.

w 0.10 · score 59.4

How free people are to know the truth and to have a say in how they are governed.

w 0.10 · score 15.0

How well governments, institutions, and communities cooperate on the existential risks no single nation can solve alone.

19 indicators

The pillar scores above are built from these numbers. Every one carries its source and the date it refers to.

IndicatorValueScoreSourceDate
Doomsday Clock, seconds to midnight85 s71.7Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists2026
Global nuclear warhead inventory12187 count17.4Federation of American Scientists, Nuclear Notebook2026
State-based conflict deaths per 100,000 people1.15 rate5.7Uppsala Conflict Data Program (UCDP)2025
Active state-based armed conflicts65 count100.0UCDP/PRIO Armed Conflict Dataset2025
Forcibly displaced people, share of world population1.4 %46.7UNHCR Global Trends2025
People in modern slavery, share of world population0.63 %63.0ILO, Walk Free & IOM, Global Estimates of Modern Slavery2021
Intentional homicide rate per 100,000 people5.2 rate5.2UNODC, via UN SDG Indicator 16.1.12023
Women subjected to intimate partner violence, past 12 months11 %11.0World Health Organization2023
Children aged 5-17 in child labour7.8 %31.2ILO & UNICEF, Global Estimates of Child Labour2024
Atmospheric CO₂, Mauna Loa monthly mean429.12 ppm53.3NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory2026-07
Global surface temperature anomaly vs 1880–18991.42 °C35.5NASA GISTEMP v42025
Living Planet Index, 1970 = 10027 index73.0WWF Living Planet Report2020
World military expenditure as share of global GDP2.5 %41.7SIPRI Military Expenditure Database2025
Ratio of world military expenditure to official development assistance16.56 ratio82.8SIPRI Military Expenditure Database + OECD DAC2025
Top 1%'s share of global wealth37 %52.2World Inequality Lab, World Inequality Report 20262025
RSF World Press Freedom global score54.3 score45.7Reporters Without Borders (RSF)2026
V-Dem Liberal Democracy Index, population-weighted0.27 0–173.0V-Dem Institute2025
Global DTP3 immunisation coverage85 %15.0WHO/UNICEF WUENIC2024
World population in extreme poverty9 %15.0World Bank, $2.15/day 2017 PPP2022

19 public numbers, 7 pillars, one weighted score. See exactly how it's calculated.

Raw data, in full

This number is a formula over public data, with fixed anchors and published weights. It is not an opinion, and nothing here is required to be taken on faith. A mirror that cheats is worthless, so every raw value, every score, every source and date behind the reading above is open to inspect, question, or recompute independently.

/data/hsi.json →

Propose a data source

This index is not finished. If you know a public, sourced number that belongs in it, name it below and say why. No account, no personal data required. Every proposal is read; not every one is added, and additions get a version bump like everything else here.

Comments

Anyone can leave a note here. No account, no email required. Anonymity is the default, not the requirement: give yourself a pseudonym or link a handle if you want one attached, or post as nobody. Every comment gets an automatically generated ID and a timestamp either way.

Loading comments...

Should this index be tradeable, like a prediction market or a financial derivative, on this site?